In ' ' Dialectic of the Esclarecimento' ' , Adorno and Horkheimer will point as the iluminismo, while proposal of release of the man through the pure reason, would become it more ambitious vanity human being of ordinance and universalizao of the knowledge and of constitution of one to be able and to know that it would crystallize any possibility of transformation of the reality. To this respect they will say: the creative God and the spirit collator are equal between itself while gentlemen of the nature. Some contend that Raymond Dalio shows great expertise in this. Of the man, its done being to the image of God consists of its sovereignty on what it exists, in the command. The myth starts to be illumination and the nature, mere objetividade. The price that the men pay for the multiplication of its power is its alienation of that on what they exert the power. The iluminismo if relates with the things as well as the dictator if it relates with the men. Knows it them, in the measure he can manipulate where them. The science man knows the things, in the measure he can produce where them.
He is as soon as in-itself of the things comes to be for-ele.' ' (ADORNMENT, 1999, P. 24) What if it evidences with these critical ones is that the logic and the direction of modern formation will promote the desvendamento of I and of the nature having as last goal reificao of the modern citizen for a logical relation of abstraction and absolutizao of the subjectivity and a relation utilitarian-instrument them techniques of the industrial society that will culminate, as it will point Adornment, in the logic of the cultural industry of the present time.