Of where the Analysis of the Speech (AD) characterizes the language as the condition of possibility of the speech. Barros (2005) still comes showing in them that in its more recent developments, semiotics treats to examine the procedures of literal organization e, at the same time, the enunciative mechanisms of production and reception of the text. ' ' We are a so complex animal species how much they are complex and plural the languages that constitute in them as symbolic beings, that is, beings of linguagem' ' (SANTAELLA, 2003, p.2). It mentions that some forms of communication exist and, also, demonstrates that in all the times, consisting human groups had always appealed the expression ways, of social sensible manifestation of and communication diverse others and of the verbal language. We observe: (...) when we say language, we want relating in them to a incrivelmente intricate gamma of social forms of communication and of significao what! it includes verbal the language articulated, but it also absorbs, also, the language of the deaf person-dumb, the codified system of the fashion, the culinria and as much others.
At last: all the systems of production of felt which the development of the ways of language reproduction they propitiate an enormous diffusion today (SANTAELLA, 2003, p.2). From the point of view that we have, we stand out what semiotics of the text is explained by Barros in the theory, (...) the semiotics has left of a spectacular vision of syntax in two conceptions of narrative: narrative as change of states, operated for transforming making of a citizen that acts in and on the world in search of the values invested in objects; narrative as succession of establishments and contract ruptures between a destinador and an addressee, of whom the communication and the conflicts between citizens and the circulation of objects elapse. Visa of this form, the manifest citizen if for diverse modalities of the communication and the language can be express to represent its thought.